@TechReport{Garlan:2008:EvoStyle,
AUTHOR = {Garlan, David},
TITLE = {Evolution Styles: Formal foundations and tool support for software architecture evolution},
YEAR = {2008},
MONTH = {June},
NUMBER = {CMU-CS-08-142},
INSTITUTION = {School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University},
PDF = {http://acme.able.cs.cmu.edu/pubs/uploads/pdf/CMU-CS-08-142.pdf},
ABSTRACT = {Architecture evolution is a central feature of virtually all software systems. As new market opportuni-ties, technologies, platforms, and frameworks become available systems must change their organiza-tional structures to accommodate them, requiring large-scale and systematic restructuring. Today arc-hitects have few tools to help them plan and execute such evolutionary paths. In particular, they have almost no assistance in reasoning about questions such as: How should we stage the evolution to achieve business goals in the presence of limited development resources? How can we reduce risk in incorporating new technologies and infrastructure required by the target architecture? How can we make principled tradeoffs between time and development effort? What kinds of changes can be made independently, and which require coordinated system-wide modifications? How can an evolution plan be represented and communicated within an organization? In this report we outline first steps towards a formal basis for assisting architects in developing and reasoning about architectural evolution paths. The key insight behind the approach is that at an architectural level of abstraction many system evolutions follow certain common patterns – or evolution styles. By taking advantage of regularity in the space of common architectural evolutions, and by making the notion of evolutions styles a first-class entity that can be formally defined, we can provide automated assistance for expressing architecture evolution, and for reasoning about both the correctness and quality of evolution paths.},
KEYWORDS = {Architectural Style}
}
|
|
